Google Business Profiles (GBP) are designed to help businesses connect with customers by providing accurate and relevant information, including their physical location. The importance of a precise, accurate address is emphasised in Google’s guidelines, which state that businesses showing their address on Google must maintain permanent fixed signage of their business name at that location. This basic requirement ensures customers can visit the business and that the business genuinely operates from the listed address.

Despite these clear guidelines, there is a persistent issue with incomplete addresses on Google Business Profiles. In countries with well-developed postal systems, where every address is formatted and accessible online, incomplete addresses should not exist on GBP. Yet, they do, and this loophole is being exploited by businesses that want the algorithm to list their profile in a specific area without having a physical location there.

 

The Loophole in Google’s System

Google allows businesses to pin their location directly on the map if their address doesn’t have a street number or the system can’t find it. While this feature is essential for businesses in developing countries with less structured address systems, it’s being misused in countries with developed postal systems, such as the UK. The intent behind this feature is good, but its application in certain regions is problematic.

When a business doesn’t have a physical location but wants to appear in local searches, an incomplete address can be a workaround. By pinning their location on the map, these businesses can deceive the algorithm into listing their profile in a desirable area, even though they don’t operate from there. This loophole is frustratingly obvious to anyone who regularly deals with GBP, yet it continues to go unaddressed by Google.

 

The Problem with Incomplete Addresses

Incomplete addresses on Google Business Profiles present several problems:

• Customer Confusion:
  An incomplete address can lead to customer frustration when they attempt to visit a business that either doesn’t exist at the listed location or is difficult to find due to vague address details.

• Trust Issues:
  When customers encounter a business with an incomplete or inaccurate address, trust in the business and Google’s platform is eroded.

• Algorithm Exploitation:
  Businesses using incomplete addresses to manipulate search results are essentially gaming the system, which can give them an unfair advantage over legitimate businesses with proper addresses.

 

Repeated Reports, No Action

Over the past several months, I have personally reported dozens of Google Business Profiles with incomplete addresses, and almost none have been acted upon. This includes a mass report I compiled on August 12th, which detailed several profiles with incomplete addresses, including the now infamous “£80 Cute Chinese Boy Male Massage London” profile that I previously wrote about.

Some examples of the incomplete addresses I reported:

Vallis Way, London W13 0DD
A residential street with no specific business location indicated.

Station Rd, Dagenham, Romford RM6 4BU
Where on Station Road? The address is incomplete and vague.

Lincoln Ave, Twickenham TW2 6PX
Again, where on Lincoln Ave? The address lacks specific details.

Google Street View images show no visible business signage in all these cases, suggesting that these businesses do not operate from the listed locations. Yet, despite my reports, these profiles remain live on Google Maps, continuing to mislead customers.

 

The Need for Algorithmic Cross-Checking

Google must improve its algorithm to detect and reject incomplete addresses, especially in regions with well-developed postal systems. Here’s what should happen:

• Any changes to a verified profile’s address should be automatically cross-checked by the algorithm. The change should be rejected if the address is incomplete or does not match a known, verifiable location.

• The algorithm could use Google Street View to validate the presence of permanent signage at the business location. If no signage is detected, the address should be flagged for review. Although street view can be outdated, they have already changed business hours from street view images.

• A manual review process should be triggered when the algorithm is uncertain. This would allow human moderators to assess whether the address is legitimate. Still, I have reported these before for manual review, so either the reports go into a black hole or there is a training failure.

 

A Call for Action

Incomplete addresses on Google Business Profiles are a symptom of a more significant issue within Google’s system—one that prioritises algorithmic efficiency over accuracy and user trust. By failing to address these incomplete addresses, Google is allowing businesses to exploit its platform, leading to customer confusion and a degradation of trust.

It’s time for Google to take this issue seriously. An algorithm that cross-checks addresses and validates them against existing postal systems and Google Street View data is not an unreasonable expectation. It’s necessary to ensure the integrity of Google Business Profiles and protect users from being misled by inaccurate information.

This isn’t just about improving Google’s service; it’s about maintaining the credibility of the entire platform. Let’s hope that Google steps up and fixes this glaring issue before more users are affected.

 
Online Ownership helps businesses stand out from the crowd without resorting to using incomplete addresses. Reach out to our Google Business Consultants for a no obligation chat.
 

 

Related Articles

• Google Business Profile Failure to Act on Spam
• Verify a Google Business Profile Without a Postcard
• Report Fake or Spam Google Business Profiles
• Google Business Profile Violations That Are Not Worth Reporting
• Mail Boxes Loophole in Google Business Profiles